There are many ways to approach a
study of the last twenty-five years of imperial Russia and the reigns
of Alexander III and Nicholas II. What I am going to do is offer
some remarks by looking at two of the main struggles that took place
between competing visions of Russia's future, and I am going to
personify those struggles in terms of first Konstantin Pobedonostsev
(1827-1907) versus Sergei Witte (1849-1915) and then followed by Evno
Azef (1869-1918) versus Petr Stolypin (1862-1911). These were men
and issues that determined Russia's fate.
These two men were similar is some very striking ways.
In terms of official rank,
these were probably two of the most important statesmen of imperial
Russia. Pobedonostsev was Ober Procurator of the Holy Synod from
1880 to 1905, which meant that he was the chief state official in
charge of all Russian Orthodox Church affairs. He was also tutor to
both Alexander III and Nicholas II. Witte was Minister of Finance
from 1892 to 1903, Chair of the Committee of Ministers from 1903 to 1905 and
then Prime Minister from 1905 to 1906.
Their visions for Russia could not have been more different than night and day.
nicknamed the "grey
eminence," was a through and through, devout conservative and convinced
supporter of "autocracy, orthodoxy and nationality " (Official
Nationality). Not unusual for nineteenth-century conservatives,
he felt that man was inherently sinful and needed the strong reigns of
church to keep order. In his book, Reflections of a Russian
almost everything there was about constitutional or
parliamentary systems, natural rights or freedoms and democracy.
Pobedonostsev felt that the people needed to maintain their respect for
the traditional institutions of Russia. Any attempt to
reform society was evil; one must, above all, preserve the autocracy intact and support the national church.
Pobedonostsev exercised considerable influence on the policies of Alexander III (a bit less so on Nicholas II), for example, by encouraging an official policy of Russification directed against the minority populations of the empire. He also worked to bring primary education under control of the church. He has usually been considered the author of the tsar's "senseless dreams" speech of 1895 when Nicholas II stated that any persons thinking about an enlarged role for zemstvos in the government, or even an expanded degree of public representation, were just having "senseless dreams." Pobedonostsev also was influential in supporting programs of religious persecution largely directed against Jews.
It is hard to determine just how much influence Pobedonostsev actually ever wielded, but it had decreased substantially by the time of the Russo-Japanese War and then the 1905 Revolution. But the ideology, which he symbolized, still found a lot of support in Russia.
made his name working on the
railroad, figuratively speaking. He actually did work in a number
of railroad posts
until in 1887 he became director of the state railways in the ministry
of finance (later promoted to Minister of Finance). There he developed the
"Witte system," a program of heavy industrialization, focusing on railway
construction--of course--that was designed to allow Russia to catch up with the
more advanced western countries in a decade or so and also allow Russian
exports to reach markets in the Near and Far East. Witte was
the first to imagine (and then carry out) the
use of massive state intervention in the economy to develop a national
economy. Above all, he wanted to bring Russia up to
European living standards. Under Witte, Russia did
economic growth rates that improved living standards for the Russian
people. He was never able to undertake an agrarian reform that
would have complemented what he had undertaken in industry and finance
(such as the gold standard 1897).
focus on industry, his success in negotiating an end to the
Russo-Japanese War and his work in crafting an end to the disturbances
of 1905 and the creation of a semi-parliamentary regime in Russia made
Witte's rivals incredibly jealous, including the tsar, and he was dismissed
from power. But his vision was one of Russia as a modernized country equal to any of its contemporaries in Europe.
Russia was like a car
being driven down a road by a drunken driver, careening down the road, veering wildly from
one lane to the other, smashing off guard rails on either side, just narrowly missing trees and oncoming traffic.
After 1905, the struggle shifted onto new ground; here symbolized by the terrorist Azef and the Russian prime minister Stolypin. Not many similarities here.
Azef, one-time journalist, salesman, thief, student, engineer, etc., was, in theory, a member-in-good-standing of the Russian socialist revolutionary party. In 1903 he became director of the party's Battle Organization and helped carry out the assassinations of prominent government figures such as the Minister of the Interior, Viacheslav Plehve in 1904 and then the tsar's uncle, the Grand Duke Sergei Alexandrovich in 1905, and Father Gapon in 1906. On the other hand, Azef was on the payroll of the Okhrana, the tsarist secret police and a key informer. Unbelievable! Unclear which side got the better deal. (Only in 1908 was Azef finally un-masked as a police agent.)
But Azef symbolizes the clear turn by Russian radicals to
terror as an instrument to achieve revolution, and the use of terror
dimensions between 1906-1911. True, there were some lulls in its
but then another spate of assassinations would occur. Radicals
were no longer confident that the government or peaceful/legal means
could move Russia in the direction of reform. These
revolutionaries now advocated a radical and complete overthrow of much
of the existing order in Russia and the realization of a socialist
future for the country. The terrorists disdained any governmental
half-measures and wanted Russia to move forward fast to that radical
so what was Stolypin's
vision of Russia. Part 1 was to restore and then maintain order
in the face of public disorder and assassinations. He instituted
military, field court martials to deal with the terror; trial one day,
hanging the next. Thousands died, and the gallows were popularly
called "Stolypin neckties." But Stolypin was not going to give
into terror. Part 2 was to get the parliamentary institutions,
i.e., the Duma, working in a partnership with the government. To
that end, he "masterminded" the alleged coup d'état of 3 June
the tsar dissolved the Second Duma and then issued a new electoral law,
which effectively disenfranchised most of the Russian population.
This provided a more balanced (read "conservative") Duma that was
supposed to cooperate in Stolypin's reform process. (The change
in the electoral law was illegal; that is why it is often labeled a
coup.) Part 3 was a massive, and far-ranging land reform carried
out by imperial decree (Later the Duma
finally approved.). The reform intended to break up the village
land commune, a system in which the commune owned the land and
parceled out strips of land to individual families to farm
(extraordinarily inefficient). Individual peasants would be able
to withdraw from the commune and consolidate their holdings into a
single, compact farm. Stolypin hoped that this would increase
agricultural productivity and also give peasants a better stake in the
economy. Funds were to be provided to peasants, and peasants were
also encouraged to migrate to Siberia in search of better land.
This was popularly called Stolypin's "Wager on the Strong," but it was
not only aimed at the "strong" and wealthy. Finally, there is
some evidence that Stolypin was preparing further administrative and
organizational reforms before his untimely death.
In some respects, Stolypin symbolizes the continued effort by reform-minded individuals to move Russia in the direction of Europe, i.e., to create a functioning parliamentary system (even though it was a bit on the conservative side), to create a yeoman-based agricultural system (that could also be considered conservative), to diminish the importance, power and prestige of the royal family. Stolypin, like Witte before him, aroused enormous jealousy on the part of his rivals (and they were everywhere; so many had problems with different aspects of hat Stolypin was doing).
So who won round 2? After all, Stolypin himself was assassinated while attending the opera in Kiev in September 1911. Interesting that the assassin--Dmitrii Bogrov was himself a man who had been assigned to protect Stolypin--did not take aim at the tsar at the opera. Disturbances soon returned on a mass scale to Russia; the imperial family concentrated on Rasputin.
Some recommended books
All materials on this site
are copyright © 2005-11, B. Blois & C.T. Evans
For information contact firstname.lastname@example.org