Notes on The Holy Alliance, 1815
 
 

The Holy Alliance was signed in Paris on 26 September 1815 by Emperor Alexander I of Russia, Emperor Francis I of Austria and King Frederick William III of Prussia while they were negotiating the Second Peace of Paris after the final defeat of Napoleon.  Note that the Holy Alliance was not the same as the Quadruple Alliance, which had been created in 1814, as a coalition directed against France.

 
Note on the image:   Though not one of the original signers of the Holy Alliance, Talleyrand (France), along with Alexander I and Metternich (Austria)--who could have cared less about Alexander's idea of a brotherhood of nations--became the personification of anti-liberal forces in Europe after 1815.
Source is Robinson and Beard, History of Europe (1921)

The Alliance was the tsar's idea.  Historians disagree about the real roots of the idea, but most tend to attribute some influence to the mystic Barbara Juliane von Krüdener.  During the late campaigns against Napoleon, the tsar had become increasingly preoccupied with mystical and spiritual matters.  He proposed the Holy Alliance, allegedly to promote Christianity in European political affairs, but in reality the Alliance became a mechanism to keep the existing European order.  In time, the other rulers in Europe signed the alliance except for King George IV of England, the pope and the sultan, who was not a Christian.

In some respects, the Holy Alliance served as propangandistic camouflage for one of the Western world's first international peacekeeping organizations--the combination of Prince Metternich (actually, Prince Klemens Wenzel Nepomuk Lothar Fürst von Metternich-Winneberg-Beilstein), who was Austria's Foreign Minister, and Viscount Castlereagh (actually The Most Honourable Robert Stewart, 2nd Marquess of Londonderry), who was England's Foreign Secretary--that attempted to repress any outbreaks of revolutionary sentiment in Europe.

Interestingly, the Monroe Doctrine in the United States was, in part, somewhat connected to the Holy Alliance in that in both cases the fear of revolutionary unrest served as the pretext for the right of other powers to intervene to maintain the existing order.

 
 

This page is copyright © 2005, C.T. Evans
For information contact cevans@nvcc.edu